Galleries of original digital artwork. Unless otherwise noted the figures depicted are not recorded images of human beings. The use of the word "video" in the descriptions is a euphemism; they are actually ITV, image-to-video renderings. I encourage you to leave a comment about the content that I post on the Blog. Your feedback can be any critique or question, except for sexually explicit comments about the subjects of the images. Thank you in advance for your participation.
Correction: either the fourth or the sixteenth image was flagged by DA. I apologize for the error in the description.
ReplyDeleteNumber Three was flagged as a minor . . . ?
ReplyDeleteHi Jameson. No, my mistake, it was either the fourth or sixteen image. That was first of many errors by the algorithm. Fortunately it meant only that the image was removed, my account was not terminated..yet.
DeleteI'm so sorry that that happened . . . Most of the freshman kids on my college soccer team - & I emphasize 'college' - looked like your models here . . .
ReplyDeleteThanks for being kind Jameson. Indeed..the algorithm is very inconsistent. I'm on my seventh DA account. It's very upsetting to go to access your account, to realize, after a confused moment, that the account is terminated. This why my DA account has so few images; I will not knowingly, make myself vulnerable to having my account deleted.
DeleteOh, I didn't mean the age thing as a criticism, but eighteen-year-olds in their Freshman year in college often as not look like they're still sophomores in High School . . . & seeing them in the showers after practice, it just confirmed what I thought . . .
ReplyDeleteHi Jameson, my reply was not meant to be a criticism of you, but of how the DA algorithm errs on the side of flagging an image of someone who could be either 17 or 19 as being a minor. At the very least the image could be removed. They decide, in many cases, to terminate the account.
Delete